Digest Engine logoDigest Engine

The research desk for your newsletter

Digest Engine reads thousands of blogs, peer newsletters, and social feeds. Track the people and companies that matter in your space. Rank every article against your own reference corpus. Get back a relevance-scored shortlist, summaries, and a draft outline.

The real struggle of curation isn't finding content

Editorial workflow comparison illustration

Spotting real news that's trustworthy, engaging, and not already flooding your subscribers' feeds.

Existing curation tools solve about a third of this problem. They rank by global popularity instead of editorial fit, so they cannot reflect who you trust or what your readers expect from you.

Why current discovery tools break down

Existing curation tools like Feedly, UpContent, ContentStudio, and generic AI content discovery products rank by generic clicks. They do not know who you trust, they cannot tell you when three peer newsletters in your niche already covered a topic this week, and they have no concept of authority or your point of view.

  • Gap 01

    Global popularity ≠ niche authority

    They rank content by generic clicks instead of weighting the people and publications you actually trust.

  • Gap 02

    The echo-chamber trap

    They cannot tell you when multiple peer newsletters in your niche already covered the same topic and you are about to arrive late.

  • Gap 03

    Blind to perspective

    They have no concept of authority and zero understanding of your editorial point of view.

A system designed to learn what you favor

Digest Engine is a project-scoped content pipeline. You point it at the sources you already use, tell it which people and companies matter in your space, and seed it with a handful of articles that represent the kind of thing you would cover. From there, every new piece of content gets embedded, scored, deduped, summarized, and ranked, while the borderline ones are routed through an LLM briefed on your project specifically.

  1. Workflow step illustration

    Connect your sources

    RSS, Reddit, Bluesky, Mastodon, LinkedIn, and inbound newsletter email via a dedicated address. Each plugin handles its own auth, rate limiting, and health checks.

  2. Workflow step illustration

    Define your taste

    Flag a starter set of articles as reference content. Add tracked entities and, if you want, feed in a few peer newsletters to bootstrap authority signals.

  3. Workflow step illustration

    Let the pipeline run

    Every new item is embedded into a per-project vector space, scored against your reference corpus, deduped against everything ingested so far, classified, and summarized. Ambiguous items get routed through an LLM that knows your project's brief.

  4. Workflow step illustration

    Curate, don't research

    Open the review queue, skim a ranked shortlist with summaries and authority signals already attached, then give feedback on the keepers and misses so the model keeps adapting.

Why Digest Engine feels different

Every project gets its own taste model, authority graph, and review flow so the system learns what your readers care about instead of guessing.

Pick the operating model that fits your stack

Start open source, move to a hosted workflow later, or keep the whole pipeline in your own infrastructure from day one.

Team

$149/mo

A shared editorial workspace for small newsletter teams shipping every week.

  • 3 editor seats
  • Review queue tooling
  • Reference corpus training
  • Priority updates
Request access

Hosted

Popular

$399/mo

Managed infrastructure for editors who want the workflow without running the ops layer.

  • Managed upgrades
  • Inbound newsletter parsing
  • Team collaboration
  • Email support
Join waitlist

Enterprise

$1499/mo

Private deployment, custom plugins, and security review for larger media or research orgs.

  • VPC or on-prem
  • Custom source plugins
  • SLA-backed support
  • Migration help
Contact Sales

Open Source

$0/mo

For teams that want full control and are happy to run the stack themselves.

  • Unlimited projects
  • Docker Compose setup
  • Bring your own models
  • Community support
Start self-hosting

FAQ

Questions teams ask before they trust this with their workflow

Straight answers about models, hosting, hallucinations, plugins, and what the system is actually doing under the hood.

How is this different from Feedly / UpContent / ContentStudio?

Three things they don't do:

  1. Authority scoring from peer newsletters. We ingest other newsletters as a first-class source and build a trust graph from who real editors link to.
  2. Per-project taste training via explicit feedback. Your thumbs-up/thumbs-down drifts a per-project reference centroid. Your shortlist genuinely changes over time. Theirs doesn't.
  3. A unified entity model. One person, all their channels, one profile, one authority score.

We also retain content indefinitely for long-term trend analysis, where most tools time out after a week.

I don't run a newsletter. I just want to curate a Slack channel / internal digest / research feed. Does this work?

Yes. A "newsletter project" is just a project-scoped curation pipeline. The draft assembly step is optional. You can use Digest Engine as a pure ranked-shortlist tool and ignore the email side entirely.

How does this handle paywalled or private content?

Source plugins handle their own auth, including authenticated RSS, OAuth flows (Bluesky, LinkedIn, Mastodon), and email-based ingestion (newsletters). Anything you can read, the system can read on your behalf. Anything you can't, it can't.

How do I add a new source?

Implement three methods on the source plugin interface: fetch_new_content, get_entity_profile, health_check.

The core system handles scheduling, retry, error routing, and Qdrant writes. Adding a source is bounded work, not a refactor.

Does my content get sent to OpenAI / Anthropic / etc.?

Only if you configure it to. The default development setup uses OpenRouter. The default production-recommended setup uses Ollama on your own infrastructure. No data flows to a third party unless you point a skill at a third-party model.

Is this just ChatGPT wrapped in a UI?

No. The core curation logic is deterministic vector similarity against your project's reference corpus. LLMs are only used to break ties in an explicit confidence band, to summarize, to extract entities, and to detect themes, each as a swappable, model-agnostic skill.

If every LLM API went dark tomorrow, you'd still get ranked shortlists.

Can I self-host?

Yes. Docker Compose for the MVP path, Kubernetes-ready (Helm + ArgoCD) for scale. The license is AGPLv3.

Turn scattered feeds into a shortlist you can trust.

Connect the sources you already trust, train one project on your editorial taste, and let the next issue start with ranked content, summaries, and a draft outline instead of a pile of tabs.

  • Project-scoped ranking
  • Editorial memory
  • Draft-ready research
01

Rank the signal

Pull your sources into one project and get a shortlist shaped by what your editorial team actually trusts.

02

Keep the context

Entity summaries, source history, and authority cues stay attached so every candidate story arrives with useful framing.

03

Start from a draft

Move from ranked research to a draft outline without rebuilding the same judgment call from scratch every week.